During my MBA course, I had a project to project my own “fake” balance sheet for the company of my choice. Of course, my balance sheet had to balance out, and I had to explain why and how I chose values. As a current or past share- or bondholder of aircraft manufacturing companies such as Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, Airbus, Embraer, EVE Holding, and Lilium, this project was exciting to me.
In business school, we learned that Total Assets = Total Liabilities + Total Equity, and this equation always must balance. So far, so good. Now my question and/or concern is: how are aircraft -either in production or finished but not received- accounted for?
Let us consider as a part of the Total Assets
the aircraft inventory.
Aircraft finished inventory could be listed as:
- the actual cost of manufacturing, i.e., summing the price of the parts and manufacturing man hours?
- the price the airline is paying per aircraft?
- the list price of the aircraft without any airline “discount”?
- none of the above
Depending on which way an aircraft manufacturer includes for example aircraft inventory in their report, the way a company represents itself can change drastically. How does one know that manufacturer X is doing it the same way or differently from manufacturer Y? Maybe the value on the balance sheet for total assets is greater for company Y since that company is using the list price for their aircraft. This is a misrepresentation since no airline pays the list price.
What is your opinion? This point is valid not only for aircraft manufacturers but for all companies.
Image: Istockphoto Credit: olm26250 Foto ID: 488498310 Upload date: 24 September 2015